Political Framework
Legal Secession Pathway
California, as the most populous and economically powerful state in the U.S., has long had a unique political identity. Its progressive values, environmental priorities, and multicultural population frequently diverge from federal policies. Despite contributing over $400 billion annually to the federal government, California lacks proportional influence in national decision-making due to the structure of the U.S. Senate and Electoral College.
Historically, secession has been viewed as unconstitutional, primarily due to the 1869 Texas v. White Supreme Court decision. However, international norms—such as those recognized by the United Nations—affirm the right to self-determination. Modern democratic movements like Scotland’s and Quebec’s demonstrate that peaceful, negotiated secession is viable when rooted in democratic consent. Given these dynamics, a legal, peaceful, and democratic process is essential to California’s path to independence.
Policy Proposal
The California Independence Initiative (24-0001A2) proposes the following:
- A Vote on Independence in 2028:
- A ballot measure will appear on the November 2026 general election.
- If passed, it will trigger a binding question for the November 2028 election:
“Should California leave the United States and become a free and independent country?”
- Participation Thresholds:
- At least 50% of registered voters must participate in the 2028 election.
- At least 55% must vote ‘Yes’ for the result to be valid.
- Commission on National Sovereignty and Independence:
- Established upon passage in 2026.
- Responsible for preparing a detailed public report on California’s viability as a sovereign nation.
- Will conduct fiscal modeling, legal analysis, diplomatic engagement, and public education efforts.
- Legal Framing:
- The vote will be considered a “vote of no confidence in the United States of America.”
- It does not by itself create independence, but formally expresses the will of the people and mandates negotiations.
Rationale
- Legitimacy Through Democracy: A supermajority and voter turnout requirement guarantees that secession is not undertaken lightly or without consensus.
- Transparency: The public report from the Commission provides voters with the data and foresight needed to make an informed choice.
- International Law: By adhering to democratic principles and respecting existing treaties, California aligns its actions with global norms on self-determination.
- Peaceful Process: Rejects any unilateral or violent separation. The process is orderly, legal, and grounded in negotiation.
- Strategic Phasing: Placing the final vote in 2028 provides adequate time to prepare legally, economically, and diplomatically.
Implementation Plan
| 2025–Jul 2025 | Collect signatures to qualify initiative for 2026 ballot (requires 546,651 valid signatures). |
| Nov 2026 | Voters decide whether to place independence question on 2028 ballot and form the Commission. |
| 2026–2028 | Commission operates, public outreach begins, white papers and viability reports published. |
| Nov 2028 | Referendum vote on California independence. |
| Post-2028 | If approved, formal negotiations with the U.S. begin. |
Projected Impact
- Public Engagement: Empowers Californians to make a collective decision about their future.
- International Credibility: Signals to the global community that California is pursuing self-determination within a framework of law and democracy.
- Federal Pressure: Forces the U.S. government to acknowledge and negotiate if the vote passes, rather than dismiss the movement as illegitimate.
- Internal Preparation: Provides time and institutional structure for designing California’s post-independence governance and economy
Governance Structure
California’s current governance model, as a state within a federal republic, limits its capacity to independently manage foreign policy, defense, immigration, and currency. While the state has been a global leader in innovation, environmental policy, and human rights, many critical decisions are shaped or constrained by federal mandates and institutions.
Independence offers the opportunity to design a governance structure that reflects California’s values, demographic diversity, and scale. The aim is to create a transparent, democratic, and accountable system of government that ensures checks and balances while enabling swift, effective policymaking.
Policy Proposal
California Vision proposes a modern governance model based on republican principles with a balance between representation, efficiency, and integrity:
Legislative Branch:
- Bicameral Legislature:
- Senate: 33 members representing geographic regions using a 4-3-2 allocation to balance rural and urban areas.
- Assembly: Population-based representation, elected every four years.
Executive Branch:
- Elected Offices: President, Vice President, Controller, Attorney General, Chief Elections Officer.
- Cabinet Appointments: All other department heads appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate.
Judicial Branch:
- Supreme Court and Constitutional Court: Independent bodies with jurisdiction over law and constitutional interpretation.
- Staggered Appointments: Justices appointed by multiple nominating bodies to ensure no single entity dominates.
Independent Oversight:
- Office of the Controller: Oversees financial integrity and independent audits.
- Independent Oversight Agency: Investigates corruption, misconduct, and regulatory abuse across all branches.
Rationale
- Regional Equity: Senate structure ensures that rural areas are not overshadowed by urban centers, preserving political balance.
- Streamlined Executive Power: A small number of elected executives avoids ballot clutter while ensuring democratic accountability.
- Judicial Independence: A split appointment process ensures independence from any single branch or party.
- Anti-Corruption Safeguards: Independent watchdogs and transparent reporting mechanisms promote public trust.
Implementation Plan
| Constitution Drafting (2026–2028) | Public process to define governance framework, codify term limits, elections, and balance of powers. |
| First National Election (Post-Referendum) | All executive and legislative offices elected during first general election after independence. |
| Oversight Bodies Operational (Year 1) | Independent Controller’s office and Judicial Appointment Commissions are seated and active within the first year. |
Projected Impact
- Legitimacy: A clear, representative, and balanced government structure builds national and international confidence.
- Efficiency: A modernized structure supports responsive governance.
- Accountability: Checks and independent oversight prevent abuse and ensure democratic resilience.
Indigenous Sovereignty
California is home to more than 100 federally and state-recognized tribes, each with distinct histories, cultures, and governments. Despite formal recognition, Indigenous communities in California have faced centuries of displacement, broken treaties, and legal marginalization. Many tribal nations continue to experience high rates of poverty, limited access to healthcare and education, and jurisdictional conflicts with state and federal authorities.
Independence provides an opportunity to build a new nation-to-nation relationship rooted in respect, legal equality, and cultural preservation. The Republic of California can set a global standard for honoring Indigenous sovereignty, self-determination, and partnership.
Policy Proposal
The Republic of California will:
- Formally Recognize Tribal Sovereignty
- All federally and state-recognized tribes will be constitutionally recognized as sovereign nations.
- Sovereignty includes the right to self-governance, natural resource control, and legal jurisdiction within tribal lands
- Establish Nation-to-Nation Treaty Frameworks
- Each tribe may negotiate binding treaties with the Republic, defining jurisdiction, resource rights, law enforcement, and economic cooperation.
- Protect Indigenous Lands and Resources
- All tribal lands are permanently protected from encroachment or state seizure.
- Water, fishing, mineral, and cultural resource rights will be secured through treaty.
- Guarantee Civil Liberties and Services
- Tribal members will be guaranteed all civil liberties under California law.
- All tribal citizens will have access to universal healthcare and free public education, while tribal institutions remain autonomous.
- Create a Tribal Recognition Commission
- Non-federally recognized tribes with historical presence may apply for state recognition through a formal process.
- Support Economic and Legal Autonomy
- Tribal governments will retain the right to collect taxes, operate businesses free from state taxes unless otherwise negotiated, and participate in state infrastructure planning.
Rationale
- Justice and Reconciliation: Acknowledging tribal sovereignty addresses historic injustices and fosters reconciliation.
- Legal Clarity: Treaties define mutual obligations and eliminate jurisdictional ambiguity.
- Cultural Preservation: Empowering Indigenous governance protects languages, traditions, and community leadership.
- Economic Development: Tribes gain more control over local economic development, boosting self-reliance.
Implementation Plan
| 2026–2028 | Begin consultations with tribal nations during constitutional drafting process. |
| Post-Independence (Year 1) | Sign initial framework treaties with all willing tribal governments. |
| Year 2+ | Finalize treaties, complete tribal land transfers from U.S. to California jurisdiction, and launch the Tribal Recognition Commission. |
Projected Impact
- Stronger Tribal Governments: Legal recognition and resource control support sovereignty and self-sufficiency.
- Reduced Conflict: Clear jurisdiction and law enforcement cooperation reduce litigation and disputes.
- Model for the World: California becomes a global leader in Indigenous rights and reconciliation.
This section is part of the California Vision.
California Vision
Learn More About The Future We're Building